中美主播就贸易战进行的辩论已经结束

接近 3 年前
22.1k 次浏览
时事新闻
 

在早期的对峙之后,备受期待的电视主播之战于昨晚八点开战。一位来自中国官方媒体,另一位是福克斯商业节目主持人,这场辩论最终变成了一场礼貌而相当平淡的交谈。

在15分钟的交谈中,福克斯电视台的Trish Regan首先就谈到了节目中可能是唯一一个真正的争论:刘欣是在为自己说话,还是在为中国共产党说话。这一度使气氛有些紧张。Trish在介绍中将刘欣介绍为党员。而刘欣直截了当地回应自己并不是党员,这都是记录在案的,并且此次谈话仅代表个人。

另一个关注点在Trish表示有证据表明中国窃取了价值数千亿的知识产权。刘欣则回应,她承认确实有“个人”和“公司”在中国犯下了侵犯知识产权的行为,并且也同意盗取知识产权和商业机密是一个很需要处理的问题。但刘欣随后强调,这种问题在多处存在,包括美国。这不能说明中国在偷窃或者说美国在偷窃,这样一概而论是没有用的。

就重要的关税一事,双方都表示取消巨额关税是一个好主意。但刘欣表示关税的规则应该通过超越中美两国的共识来改变。

剩下的“辩论”可以说是一场平淡无奇的采访,涉及贸易和经济、中国电信巨头华为,以及中国作为一个发展中经济体的地位。

刘欣告诉Trish虽然很多人认为中国的经济是国有的,但超过80%的人都是被私企所雇佣,80%的出口商品也是私企生产的。

这场非常礼貌并且收敛的谈话于此前两人之间的激烈交锋形成鲜明对比,双方几乎都没有反驳对方的观点。辩论结束后,刘欣对此次机会表示感谢,并邀请Trish来中国旅游。

责任编辑:  
来源:  SCMP
点赞 (0)
脸书分享
微信分享
4条评论

Ummm,, Trish does get a good team to collect information and she comes prepared. Xin Liu is not as good as I thought before. I am not sure how Xin Liu performed could be considered good, since Trish threw out so many FACTS you cannot deny, including WTO stuff and intellectual properties. Xin Liu said it happened in the US as well, but she did not show facts. Most, my feelings, of her words are comments and opinions.

Anyway, it is a good start for conversations between people, instead of governments, from these two countries.

Zheng Qu接近 3 年前

Can't agree with you. To me, Trish kept throwing qustions to Xin and when Xin said sth she can't deny, she just threw another Q. If this was a debate, Xin would definitely win because she properly answered all the questions. And you said Xin did not show facts, that is also not correct. For example when Trish asked when will China stop claiming to be a developing country, Xin replied with FACT that although we have rather high GDP, the population is of 1.4 billion and thus the average is still low. If statistics is not fact, math is not fact, what is? I agree that both side raises good points and it is good to have such conversations as a start, but it seems that you don't really have a objective opinion.

To be honest, I think Xin was overly polite. She meant to present a humble image rather than an arrogant lightheaded person that Trish did. Or perhaps Xin was nervous to speak a non-native language in a conversation like this. I bet Trish might sounds like a fool if she had to speak Chinese instead. However, Xin is indeed too soft on some of her replies that she probably should’ve had a stronger stance when stating the facts. And last but not least, the entire conversation is a one sided Q&A rather than a “debate”. It was Trish asking questions over and over again, so I don’t know why they’d call it a debate when there was only one person raising the questions. And Trish, as the host, was rude enough to disturb when others are still speaking. She is the embodiment of lack-mannered person.

FireHint接近 3 年前

emmm...
It's Trish's host, it's normal for her to do quick interview for more information for her audiences, so, in my opinion, this is not a debate but an interview instead. Xin could invite Trish to Xin's host for interview as well.

I agree with the fact part you are talking about, but those facts are not the point to me. I am saying about how Xin Liu answers tough questions about the trade war and intellectual properties. I said I did not hear Xin Liu fight back with facts in terms of issues Trish challenged. You are talking about facts to questions like when China stop claiming itself a developing country. We are not on the same page.
You can, for sure, think Xin is good to give facts about China developing country stuff, but that's not a question that I am interest.

I never claim my opinions are objective, it is my feeling, just like how you feel about my comment.